Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Rumour of the day

Pls seek for permission should you need to extract any of my point of views. Thank you.

Even though this was not much of a major issue to most of us, but since I've received request to voice out, I'm doing so.

This was the "hot issue" for today. (*sings* nega issue issue issue issue, hot issue~)

Again, it was spread in the morning. Via Facebook. Despite how hard we tried to keep mum about it down in twitdom to not traumatise the rest, well I guess rumours are meant to be spread afterall...

===================================

reposted from HK TS’ blog

Words that Mal had Personally Told TWTS
2010.06.29 23:04
Mal and Baby had first signed with DSP.
It was only at the 5th anniversary
that the five learnt that DSP didn’t want to sign Kyu.
There’s no way SS501 could continue.
Hyun Joong requested that DSP sign with Kyu first before his signing the contract.
DSP refused.
Hyun Joong recommended that Kyu goes to YG.
……
So turned out everyone had to sign with different companies
and come next year,
the various companies to collaborate for them to release an album.
YS and Kyu are currently in Japan.
YS is negotiating the OST of some drama,
Kyu is in discussion with YG.
Mal had said this (same thing) to TS on the plane three times
that the five of them will release an album next year,
The reason why Hyun Joong signs with another company…
IS TO PROTECT THE OTHER FOUR, TO PROTECT SS501, AND TO PROTECT THE FANS.
Coz DSP refused to sign with Kyu…
so Hyun Joong’s helping Kyu to sign with YG,
and Hyun Joong wanted DSP to sign with Kyu by threatening to sign with another agency.
Mal and Baby had initially thought everyone would be renewing their contracts,
so they had gone on ahead and signed first.
Mal further said…. they would be separated for this year…
but next year, they will continue to work together through different companies
YS also said something like that….
that the five of them will continue on like this year after year…
the interpretation is that they would be working together again next year.
Coz so long as they’re missing just one member, that signifies the splitting up of SS501…
so Hyun Joong surfaced first to face everything
(blogger’s personal notes… omitted)


========================================

I thought the above post was good to help those numbskulls stop bashing HJL. IF this news was true, don't you think HJL is an angel? And aren't you feeling guilty hurling those nasty words at him yesterday? I hope you did some soul searching.

However I did not think it was a wise idea to alert the others. For that would probably divert the attention to Kyu and DSP. Sure, pin-pointing at DSP doesn't harm us. But don't you feel enough is enough? I really pity us. I know we are very emotionally tired already.. so pls, be calm my darlings..

Ytd was HJL, today is DSP, tmr.. idk, newspaper. Aren't you tired already? I mean, if there's so much time for us to keep chasing and be led by such non-affirmative information, I'd seriously rather I spend my time re-watching Idol world or BOF for another 50 times...

Ok now put that aside.

There is no evidence that this is true.

Like I said, there were some loopholes.

(1) DSP does not want to re-contract with Kyu? They are plain stchupid if that's the case. What makes you think KyuJong is not desirable in any way? Other agencies are probably fighting over Kyu until their heads bleed, if I must say...

(2) Jungmin telling the fans such top secret? Geezus our Jungmin is a no-brainer to tell them such sensitive issue? 3 times somemore. Lol. Make it 10 next time... :)

(3) And YS saying the same thing as well? Idk but I do not think our 5 boys are so oblivious to the industry to not know what to say, what not to say.. :)

This was what I tweeted earlier when I sensed the chaos in twitdom:

Fan accounts can be real. But it can come from antis too. Antis not necessary have to make the story sound nasty. But they can make it appear in the way that the fandom starts splitting up.

No comments:

Post a Comment

It's a girl's thing

Craves. Corsets. Critiques